Understanding the Salary Cap
Last week, the list of NFL teams and how much room they have left under the salary cap for the 2008 NFL season leaked out. At the top of the list of 32 teams with the most cap room still available was the Chiefs, listed at $31.9 million.
This set off all the conspiracy theorist in the media and even some among the fans that the Chiefs were going cheap. The Hunt Family was trying to save money because of the commitments to the rehab of Arrowhead Stadium. And of course, there was the ever popular blame it on the guy who is supposedly responsible for everything that goes wrong, Carl Peterson.
Unfortunately, the folks in the media do not really understand the salary cap. Never have. Never will. I can’t say that I’ve got my arms wrapped around it, but I work every day to understand what it all means and the effect it has on the most important thing: what happens on the field. So let’s deal with the facts here and see if we can explain what’s going on and show that having this room under the cap is not necessarily a bad thing.
First, here are numbers you can count on:
Â
| Â | Â | |
| 2008 NFL salary cap base figure |
$116,000,000 |
|
| Chiefs 2008 salary cap number |
$127,600,000 |
|
| Minimum NFL teams must use under the ‘08 cap |
$100,224,000 |
|
| Chiefs cap number right now |
$96,985,000 |
|
| Amount they must spend to reach the minimum |
$3,239,000 |
|
| Total amount left under their ‘08 cap number |
$30,615,000 |
|
Â
Those are the facts, take them to the bank.
The earlier number of $31.9 million was accurate at the time, but that was just for the top 51 contracts on the roster. Once the final cutdown came, the cap number is then the 53 players on the active roster, the practice squad, the injured-reserve list, the PUP list and the Non-Football Injury lists.
In all likelihood when the NFL settles its books for the first week, the Chiefs will still have more cap room than any other team in the league. It will probably stay that way all season.
How can the Chiefs have more money under the cap this year than the base figure? Because of how the system works with bonuses, those paid and those that go unpaid. This can get complicated, so let me try to make it as simple as possible. Players have clauses in their contracts where they receive bonuses based on performance. If they perform and receive their bonus, that money gets counted against that year’s cap total. If they don’t perform and achieve the bonus, that unpaid money is credited to the next year’s cap total. Teams also create bonuses with some players that they know will never be achieved. Thus, it takes some of the surplus money under the cap in one year and pushes it into the next year.
The Chiefs were one of the teams that pioneered this method of salary cap maneuvering going back to the last contract signed by the late Derrick Thomas. They’ve been able to push $3 to $4 million a year into the next season and that’s now grown in the last few years to $11.6 million in extra money.
There are only two out of the 32 teams in the NFL this year that have a salary cap number of $116 million: Arizona and Cincinnati.
There are six teams that do not have the full $116 million: Detroit $110.6 million; New York Giants, $112.9 million; Houston, $113.8 million; Pittsburgh, $114.1 million; San Diego, $115.4 million and Atlanta, $115.6 million.
That leaves 24 teams that have more than the $116 million. Minnesota has the most with $134.4 million. The Chiefs total of $127.6 million is the seventh highest.
So what happens with that extra cap space? The Chiefs will consider contract extensions for young players who go out in ‘08 and play well. At the top of that list will be LB Derrick Johnson. Others like DE Tamba Hali and FS Jarrad Page could be part of the discussion. Depending on how he performs, the Chiefs could talk new contract with QB Brodie Croyle. At the end of the ‘08 season four current starters will need new contracts: Page, RG Adrian Jones, C Rudy Niswanger and LB Pat Thomas. Croyle can void the final year (2009) on his contract if he plays in 85 percent of the offensive plays this year.
There’s another number that factors into discussion of player compensation and that’s cash dollars. Right now, the Chiefs are projecting that in 2008 they will pay players in excess of $110 million. That will rank them right in the middle of the league when it comes to money paid out in 2008. If you are a Chiefs fan you’ve heard Peterson talk many times about cash and cap dollars. They are very different numbers. Eventually, those cash dollars are factored into the salary cap, but that’s just an accounting process throughout the league, not a banking process. The cash dollars come out of the Chiefs/Hunt bank account. It’s another example that the Chiefs didn’t go cheap.
We’ve seen the Chiefs juggle the cap numbers in the past when they had an older team and signed those players to big-money new deals. Those multiple signing bonuses were pro-rated for cap purposes and many times the Chiefs had to massage contracts to get all their players and numbers under the NFL cap maximum.
Things are different now because they have such a young team, one that’s relatively free of big-money contracts. Right now they’ve basically got five big-dollar players under the cap: RB Larry Johnson, TE Tony Gonzalez, CB Patrick Surtain and first-round draft choices DT Glenn Dorsey and LT Branden Albert. Dorsey and Albert have big pay checks because rather than a signing bonus, they took their money in guaranteed base salaries. Thus, there’s no pro-ration of the signing bonus down the road.
Also understand this: the way the Chiefs have put together their cap for this year, they are setting themselves up for the future, with an uncapped season ahead for the league in 2010 and possibly a new agreement with the players. No matter what happens, the Chiefs right now are positioning themselves to be able to play whatever player compensation field they are given. We will talk more about that in the near future.
Players who perform will be rewarded, eating up the cap surplus. Some of the money will go into bonuses that will push dollars into next season
The Chiefs are where they should be given their team and their place right now in the NFL. It has nothing to do with going cheap, saving money because of construction and so forth. It’s the natural by-product of what happens when you clean the decks and go with younger players.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â



I heard our friend “Kevin” on 810 ranting about this. It is about as mad as I’ve ever heard him…which is saying something. I’m still a bit skeptical that the Chiefs are penny-pinching to get this stadium done, but I figured that there was some salary cap nonsense that I didn’t understand.
what about the 3.2 to reach the minimum?
and what happens if they don’t make the min?
Sounds like alot of Enron Economics Bob.
Here is a simple yes or no question:
Is any of the salary cap money that the chiefs currently have ($127.6 mill) go anywhere but to the players (either now or in the future)?
The same radio personality that is driving this discussion was just last year lamenting the “foolish” Chiefs for handcuffing thier salary structure with Larry Johnson’s contract. So which is it? Not enough money being spent, or too much? Or just his personal vendetta against all things Chiefs.
One good thing, his station making fun of your web site, led me to it. Thanks.
Gretz, how can the Chiefs be setting themselves up for a future, that is uncapped, by being so far below the cap now?
Your articles rarely make sense.
A chance to comment on your comments.
WILLIS
Thanks for writing, but I wonder why you bother reading if I don’t make sense. There are a lot of other avenues and outlets where you could spend your time.
Did you ever consider that the future may not be uncapped and that the cap may continue? Did you consider that by having this money now, they can tie up the young players that perform well this year before the uncapped year, thus those players will not be able to move on and become free agents in a wide open market.
The Chiefs have done what they’ve done because they are a young team, with young players who will either be great, good or average. Having this money will allow them to invest in the great and good players and keep them. This money then allows them to find free agents to step in and improve positions where they are average.
It’s really not that hard to understand.
FINDTHE DR: the salary cap is NFL accounting. If the Chiefs don’t spend all of their cap number, it simply disappears. It’s not like they’ll spend $110 Million and then $17 million goes in the Hunt’s pocket. The cap provides a maximum a team can spend and a minimum. Not every team will spend up to the cap limit. The only way that money survives this season is through these unlikely to be earned bonuses that push the money into the next year.
KEN: the Chiefs will easily reach the minimum. If they sign Derrick Johnson to a new deal, they’ll easily spend that this year and probably triple that in bonuses and guaranteed money.
TO ALL:
Again, I can’t stress this enough: this cap surplus right now is the product of going with a young roster. Consider that there are 16 players on the roster have never played a real NFL game. That’s 16 of 53. Only two of those guys are first-round picks with big money.
As for the sports talk yakkers, hey, we all know what their agendas are. Few deal in fact; they prefer fiction, so they take a sliver of truth and create fiction around it because they don’t understand and don’t care how it really works. It’s simplier to make things up.
Mr.Gretz, thanks for taking the time to reply to our comments/questions.
A followup to your response:
“the salary cap is NFL accounting. If the Chiefs don’t spend all of their cap number, it simply disappears…The only way that money survives this season is through these unlikely to be earned bonuses that push the money into the next year.”
Question/Comment: To say what isnt spent “disappears” sounds disingenuine, IMO. The salary cap is coming out of the teams total revenue. What isn’t spent (or carried over to next yr via unearned bonuses) stays within that budget/revenue that can be spent on other things or kept as profit. Isnt that correct? Thus is all the salary cap (currently $127 mill) going to either be spent on players or carried over to next yr via unearned bonuses?
You also said: “the way the Chiefs have put together their cap for this year, they are setting themselves up for the future, with an uncapped season ahead for the league in 2010 and possibly a new agreement with the players.”
In an uncapped year these accounting practices wont matter. An owner, such as Dan Snyder or Jerry Jones, can pay whatever they want out of their pocket.
The chiefs have one of the smallest coaching staffs in the NFL (thus less overhead) even though they have one of the youngest teams in the NFL. Currently the chiefs also have the largest unused salary cap space. Chiefs are now in the midst of trying to rename Arrowhead with a corporate sponsored name. This all adds up to a shrewd buisnessman who is ‘cutting the fat’ in order to increase profits. I guess that is one way for a small market team to keep up with the big boys.
Good read Bob, Thanks!
So where or will These “Cap dollars” come into play IF there is no agreement by the end of this one?
I guess my question is will “cap dollars only help in the next two yrs?
Damn! I ment Cash dollars