<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"

	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Update 9/4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html</link>
	<description>Dedicated to providing the best coverage of the Kansas City Chiefs.  News, commentary, reports, and exclusive inside information - daily!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:14:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Korson</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Korson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>Guys, Jackson is really not a fit here, he is Reche Caldwell part 2, florida recievers have this history....

KC will have Bowe/Darling/Webb and use a lot of Tony G/Cottam with Cox at FB...bigger bodies, and possibly going 2 RB to put Charles on the field versus a slow D...

If KC felt Chad Jackson was an upgrade, it would happen, evidently they feel hes simply a Freddy Mitchell at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, Jackson is really not a fit here, he is Reche Caldwell part 2, florida recievers have this history&#8230;.</p>
<p>KC will have Bowe/Darling/Webb and use a lot of Tony G/Cottam with Cox at FB&#8230;bigger bodies, and possibly going 2 RB to put Charles on the field versus a slow D&#8230;</p>
<p>If KC felt Chad Jackson was an upgrade, it would happen, evidently they feel hes simply a Freddy Mitchell at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince D</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>BJ Sams could probably line up in the slot if he absolutely had to... he had a couple snaps with the offense before I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ Sams could probably line up in the slot if he absolutely had to&#8230; he had a couple snaps with the offense before I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Pacific Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>A Pacific Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll bring 3 WR to New England, because we&#039;re not going to be passing much, and we will activate all 5 running backs.  Maybe we&#039;ll go back to a wishbone offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll bring 3 WR to New England, because we&#8217;re not going to be passing much, and we will activate all 5 running backs.  Maybe we&#8217;ll go back to a wishbone offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidS</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>What differences in quality of practice are there by going inside instead of practicing outside?  Do you think this will hurt them on Sunday?

Thank you Bob,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What differences in quality of practice are there by going inside instead of practicing outside?  Do you think this will hurt them on Sunday?</p>
<p>Thank you Bob,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: findthedr</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>findthedr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>I too am suprised the Chiefs didnt bring in Jackson if nothing else but to give him the eyeball test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am suprised the Chiefs didnt bring in Jackson if nothing else but to give him the eyeball test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.bobgretz.com/chiefs-football/thursday-practice-update-94.html/comment-page-1#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobgretz.com/?p=1974#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Ok, So if Price and Franklin are going to be inactive, are the chiefs only going to go with 3 WRs (Bowe, Webb, Darling) to New England? 

And Bob, why is this team not looking at a young young WR talent like Chad Jackson?

                                  Thanx Bob,
                                      Giovanni</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, So if Price and Franklin are going to be inactive, are the chiefs only going to go with 3 WRs (Bowe, Webb, Darling) to New England? </p>
<p>And Bob, why is this team not looking at a young young WR talent like Chad Jackson?</p>
<p>                                  Thanx Bob,<br />
                                      Giovanni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
