“You guys line up alphabetically by height.”

- Former Oilers coach Bill Peterson -

How Important Was Last Night’s Triumph?

Here’s your one-word answer: Very.

Yes, it came against a team that was protecting its most talented players. Yes, it still took place within the time frame of the training schedule. And no, the corresponding footage surely won’t be classified under the “CLASSIC” tag at the NFL Films headquarters.

Still, you can’t properly measure the value that it has.

Under different circumstances, the outcome of the pre-season finale between the Chiefs and the Packers would not have been considered as a subject for dissection. In fact, the very game would not have been worthy of additional attention. We can all agree on that. Taking into account that these kinds of instances are primarily being used nowadays as a last resort for a handful of rather desperate individuals (either struggling to fulfil their dreams of becoming active members of the fraternity called National Football League, or simply trying to hang on for dear life to that already-attained status), it really wouldn’t be that surprising to expect the final analyses to be focused around performances like the ones presented by Jackie Battle, Travis Daniels and Jackie Bates.

But every now and then, important concerns do get to be clarified at the last hour. And for the Arrowhead Ones (as a whole), the positive 17-13 result against Green Bay shed an inspiring light on more relevant issues than the customary ones that first meet the eye. Some that cannot be judged by raw numbers, and that primarily, are based on gut feelings. Among those achieved you can count:

The Confirmation Of A Possible Breakthrough

The Chiefs’ defeat of the Broncos in the final game of the ’09 campaign made us all believe that we were entering 2010 with the right foot. A perception that was reinforced at the beginning of the Free Agency period, and just as fortified after the conclusion of the NFL Draft and the advances registered during training camp. But for the Chiefs to get a true head start on what could be the turning point for the franchise, they had to win the game celebrated on Thursday. And I can’t stress HAD enough.

Pressed by a less-than-stellar 0-7 mark in pre-season encounters during the Pioli-Haley tenure, this game represented one of the initial trying moments for the ’10 version of the Kansas City Chiefs, if only because it would’ve been impossible — for me, anyway — to conceive the idea of a looming turnaround after enduring the second of back-to-back winless pre-seasons. In other words, if the team was really THAT eager to make the leap into respectability, it needed to show improvement in all areas. Including those that seem somewhat useless (again, the pre-season). To get tangible proof that they are headed in the right direction. After more than two years, improvement at this stage could’ve only been written with a capital W in the scoreboard, and to the Chiefs’ credit — with the clock winding down to add a little pressure — they did exactly that.

The Nurturing Of The Roar

Even though the Chiefs endured yet another heartbreak against the Eagles at the end of last week’s game, this man did not ignore the funny thing that happened in the middle of the same: How the crowd became alive. Inspired by a combination of the re-opening of the home digs, the furious comeback during the 2nd and 3rd quarters of play, and the five takedowns of the Philly QB’s, the patrons responded by delivering a background the likes of which we haven’t seen in a while, indeed constituting a sight that was truly remarkable once you realized that we were in the midst of a training activity.

To compensate for that effort, the Chiefs needed to deliver the retribution rather quickly in the form of a victory, and by doing so in their very next outing they have secured a precious asset for the Monday Night opener. Mainly, because you can take this to the bank: If the Chiefs plan to blindside the Chargers on September 13th, they will have to rely on the roar of the beast (Arrowhead Stadium) that carried this franchise to legendary heights during the 90′s. But to attain that proverbial growl, the team was more than compelled to throw a proverbial bone. And it’s safe to say that the triumph at the expense of the Cheeseheads gave the fans something to enjoy until Opening Day. Don’t you think?

The Improvement Of The Weakest Links

And obviously, this is the main issue. The talk about the positive strides that the Chiefs’ first-teamers made from the Atlanta game to the Philly game was all well and good, and it was a fine reason to be optimistic. Given that the bulk of the regular season success will most likely be traced to the efforts that the leaders of the depth chart might provide, it only felt natural to be encouraged by whatever productive developments we were able to perceive from them in a recurrent basis.

But it’s an undeniable truth that a team (like a chain) is only as strong as its weakest links, and the Philly game showed us a glimpse of a bigger picture, in which we simply did not display enough competence to hold down the fort for 60 minutes — a malady that has haunted us for quite some time. And last week, that responsibility fell square in the shoulders of the 2nd and 3rd-stringers. Aware that the fate of yesterday’s game once again was left in the hands of those striving to make this team in the first place, their winning contribution rightly serves as a promising sign that when the roster finally gets trimmed down to the final 53, even our weakest links could be on the verge of getting stronger, since they were the ones who closed out the deal against the Packers (also a group of 3rd-stringers, but still). And truly, this is an image that is appealing to say the least.

Relaxed after getting more knowledge about the team, the aforementioned paragraphs explain the reasons why I was utterly interested in what should’ve been an otherwise pointless game. It’s no secret that for the Chiefs to embark on what we all hope could be an interesting ride they first have to create a successful atmosphere. Of course, not only by embracing the idea, but materializing it as well, even if they had to go the distance in their last pre-season game.

In essence, a fitting end to this part of the process. ‘Cause when you think about winning, there’s nothing meaningless around it.


8 Responses to “How Important Was Last Night’s Triumph?”

  • September 3, 2010  - Nate says:

    We have a saying here in the high Rocky mountains.
    It goes like this. There is more than one way to skin a wolf, but however you do it; the wolf isn’t going to like it! second verse: If you are going to skin that wolf, you better have a sharp knife! Matt Cassel appears to have a very dull knife! I have read in the KC fishwrap that the Chiefs can opt out of Cassel’s contract after the 2nd year. Bob is this true? If it is wouldn’t it make sense to go after Matt Lienert? Let him be the #3 for a year and see if they can instill the right work ethic in him. What kind of draft pick would it take to get him? Thanks Bob! Nate


  • September 3, 2010  - Edward says:

    LOL go after Leinart Nate how old are you. Do you watch football. Cassell has had more success in this league than Leinart probably would ever have. And Leinart had potentially two hall of fame receivers to throw to in Boldin and Fitzgerald. He still can’t get it done even now with emerging Steve Breston and Fitzgerald. And you bang on Cassel performance last yr with the worst o-line and receiving core in the league LMAO. You can’t be serious. After this season all these so called Chiefs fans who banging on Cassel will eat their words at the end of the season. Just like you were when you were bashing Trent Green after his first season with the Chiefs.


  • September 3, 2010  - el cid says:

    Will again say. If Cassel fails, then Pioli set back this rebuild until 2014…..that’s right…..2014. Get the new savior, get him in the system, and get him on the field with occasionally failing games, then success. Please let Cassel succeed because it would be lousy to start over again.

    As for Lienert, NFL Channel says his fellow players will not play for him. His problem is on the field, not much of a general. No thanks.


  • September 3, 2010  - Michael says:

    I don’t think Cassel will fail, but if he does I don’t think it will take until 2014 to right the ship. That’s if you’re talking about just Cassel.

    The team is going to continue to build, regardless of what happens with Cassel; so in, say 2011 or 2012, a new quarterback would come in to a much better team with a much stronger supporting cast.

    Now, if you’re talking about tearing the whole thing down to the slates and nails, again, 2014 might be about right.

    I wouldn’t mind Leinart coming in to be the no 2.


  • September 3, 2010  - Michael says:

    Enrique, nice story. I felt the same way about the W last night. Should have gotten one the week before, too. I almost would have agreed with putting some of the starters back in the Philly game just to finish it off.

    But, you got to see what the bottom of the roster looks like also. Some of them have actually looked pretty good; some have looked awful. Last night somebody was making some huge assignment mistakes in the secondary and along the DL that made me cringe.

    I kind of feel bad for some of the better second, and even third team guys, because they have to play with all the other hopefuls or longshots most of the time. That makes it much harder to look good. When I have seen the Chiefs get some of those guys involved with the regulars this season, I’ve been encouraged-guys like Battle, Horne, J. Williams, Asamough, Richardson, etc. So, yes, it’s good to see.


  • September 4, 2010  - Tracy says:

    Matt Casssell sat on USC’s bench while Matt Leinhart played and won the Heisman Trophy. But Leinart returned for his senior year, took a course or two in ball room dancing and generally basked in the Hollywood lifestyle to which he had grown accustomed.
    Some might argue that Leinart’s college success resulted from the system–i.e., Pete Carroll’s thumb-you-nose-at-the-rule-books-let’s-party–in which he played. Okay, okay that’s a stretch but the buoyant promise of his college experience did not carry over to the NFL. The contrast between his college-to-the-NFL experience and success and that of Kurt Warner could not be more stark.
    Down deep, there is probably a lot more desire in Cassell to succeed due to his bench warming experience than there ever will be in Leinart and that cannot be hidden from his teammates.
    Maybe he will end up in Seattle with Pete Carroll. Otherwise, there may not be many likely landing places for him.


  • September 4, 2010  - Chris says:

    Great point about Cassel. KC plays Seattle this year, I bet Cassel will have a ton of motivation to play really really well in that game to show Carroll he made a mistake benching him at USC (even though they still won national titles without him playing..)


  • September 5, 2010  - BigJimInWisconsin says:

    I agree with your premise, Enrique. Might I add that the Packers 2nd and 3rd stringers lit up the Colts in the 2nd half of last week’s game. They did not do the same to us. Those Packers were trying to impress this week also. The Chiefs did not allow 50+ points against us this time. There is hope and confidence.




Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.



Categories

2012 NFL Draft
Chiefs Players
Commentary
Cup O'Chiefs 2011
Cup O'Chiefs 2010
Cup O'Chiefs 2012
Game Coverage 2011
Game Coverage 2010
History
Mouth Of Todd 2011
Other News
Practice Update 2011
Premium Coverage

Archives


RSS


Pages

Home